7
Now See No. 21.
1.0.
fish, the Japanese had no right
interfire with them.
Case Even
65
This would abols the
JUAN SÁTANA SEKCIA
Am if they were Engaged in manup
... supplying Chuia
breause the blockals at present only
with fish, mu
affrets Chinese vessels.
(2) If there fishing vessels, havon, wone
Chinese and were doing no more than is contemplated by Article 3 of the Itaque International Commution of 1907, the Japanese action would appen to m a heach of the Convention and a matter for the Chinese Gornament to
deal with.
Shout in unclined to ask the F.C. Cules apparenth ham a copy of No.11) if they agree that this is the position, and to say that, if they do ame, we propose to ask Itove Kong preasily what the facts were.
21/9/37
11. Duncan.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.